Surely most people retiring to another country are going to be deriving the bulk of their income from foreign sources.
Itâs in Connexion. So probably not.
https://www.vie-publique.fr/en-bref/298439-circulaire-retailleau-sur-la-naturalisation-des-etrangers
"Enfin, pour attester de leur autonomie et dâune installation stable en France, les demandeurs devront justifier :
- dâune insertion professionnelle avĂ©rĂ©e et durable: un contrat Ă durĂ©e indĂ©terminĂ©e (CDI) de plus dâun an ou plusieurs contrats Ă durĂ©e dĂ©terminĂ©e (CDD) sur une pĂ©riode dâau moins deux ans ;
- de ressources stables et suffisantes, par rĂ©fĂ©rence au salaire minimum interprofessionnel de croissance (SMIC), les revenus rĂ©sultant en majoritĂ© de prestations sociales ou provenant de lâĂ©tranger Ă©tant exclus."
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/download/file/pdf/cir_45604/CIRC
See section 3.2 of the new Guidelines:
Connexion: big on outrage, little on verification of what they report. Thereâs no indication they even saw what correspondence the applicant received.
Yes but the official circular mentioned does in fact state that applications from individuals who derive most of their income from abroad are to be rejected.
If thatâs the text in the post above then I think the par rĂ©fĂ©rence au smic is the key phrase to which the rest applies.
My understanding that the sufficiency of the personâs income is to assessed by reference to the SMIC. And that the instruction to disregard income that derives mostly from welfare benefits OR abroad is completely separate from this.
If that were the case then all the pensioners in France living off their foreign income would have been refused.
But this is new. The circular was published in May 2025.
Ah, is this the new stuff being pushed out by that Right Wing guy? Iâve seen press coverage that to impoae new conditions via that Circular was illegal without having made it law via the correct channels ie got it voted and got a dĂ©cret first.
Bit worrying if prefectures are already acting on it.
Well if they really are going to look at visa applications thus way (and not just citizenship) then I wonât be moving to France, nor will pretty much any non-French retiree in future! 100% of my income would be from outside France (state pension and private pension etc.)
Somehow I canât believe that is really the intention, but who knows?
This has happened before several (many?) times.
What we donât know is the totality of that personâs dossier as decisions are rarely on a single item - unless a really negative one. The core requirement for gaining nationality is that France is the centre of your life, and they set out broad ways in which this is assessed. But then it is for the Agent to assess.
I haven ât read the article, but perhaps the totality of their dossier was weak and this was the final straw. Was their French fluent, were they well integrated, did they travel back to wherever they came from a lot, did they contribute actively to their commune, was there a nuisance complaint against them. And did they know their stuff about France or just stumble through the interview?
No point speculating. The runes are that Agents will be tougher, but it doesnât necessarily mean that all people with just a foreign pension will automatically be refused. Just that every other aspect must be correct.
It has always been SMIC. The telling point to me is âdoesnât demonstrate that they have transferred all their interests to Franceâ. So something as simple as having an AV could be enough.
Not necessarily, because (not for the first time) prefectures have not been consistent in their interpretation/implementation of the regs.
This issue is only about acquiring French citizenship, not post-Brexit carte de sejour applications.
Whereas, youâre currently living in the UK, French citizenship isnât essential to live here and would in any case require five years residency beforehand, so I donât think you should lose too much sleep over this.
I have a good friend whoâs due to have his final
interview for citizenship this summer. All
his income is foreign source. So letâs see what happens. Heâs been here for years, kept his nose clean, has excellent French, pays his taxes, etc. So if they reject him itâll almost certainly be because of this new circular.
Why âalmost certainlyâ? Keeping your nose clean and paying taxes is not actually all thatâs required.
Thatâs true - but if they are applying a âwhereâs your income from?â criterion to citizenship it would seem a fairly small step to also apply it to residency.
No indeed - of course itâs all hypothetical at this point and we donât know all the facts about this one case.
Non-EU residents of France pay taxes, but canât vote - donât imagine any RW party would wish to change that!
Well youâd think so, but the example of Trump in America and his and his cohortsâ treatment of valuable members of society is not an edifying one.