Hello,
I’m curious what others make of this, particularly anyone who has employed someone through Pajemploi (URSSAF).
My nanny has always been paid by bank transfer (never cash), declared through Pajemploi (URSSAF), receives monthly payslips, and all employer social contributions have been paid through the Pajemploi system. I also pay her during her lunch break and reimburse any work-related expenses.
From me alone, she received around €14,000 net in 2025 (she started part-way through the year).
This was her first French tax return, so she filed a paper return in 2026 for her 2025 income. She later showed me her avis d’impôt, which shows employment income of only around €2,500.
When I asked why, she said it was difficult to work out how much to declare. I found that difficult to understand, as each payslip shows the cumulative totals for the year, and the difference between €2,500 and the €14,000 net she received from me is significant. I even wondered whether she had accidentally used a single payslip, but her monthly net pay was generally around €2,100, so that doesn’t fit either.
I’m also aware that she worked for another family before joining me in 2025, and they were also declaring her through Pajemploi. That makes it even more surprising, as I would have expected her total declared employment income for the year to have been higher than the €14,000 net she received from me alone, not substantially lower.
The employment income shown on her avis d’impôt doesn’t appear to match either the payslips or the bank transfers. As far as I’m aware, I have fulfilled all my obligations as the employer: she has been declared through Pajemploi, all wages have been paid by bank transfer, monthly payslips have been issued, and all employer social contributions have been paid.
To be clear, I’m not asking whether she paid the correct amount of tax. My question is simply about the income she declared.
Has anyone come across anything like this before? Is there an innocent explanation I may be overlooking, or would a discrepancy of this magnitude normally raise concerns about a deliberate under-declaration of income?