New EU deportation rules

“[N]ew rules will allow member states to dramatically expand their deportation powers – marking the most hardline turn in EU migration policy in decades.

“Here’s what changes, in a nutshell:

“* EU member states can strike bilateral deals with distant countries to build so-called ‘return hubs’ on their territory and send irregular migrants there. The hubs can be either places of transit or locations where a person is expected to stay.

  • National authorities can conduct raids on sites associated with an irregular migrant, a provision that has been likened by critics to the tactics of the US’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE.
    “* ​Deportation orders can be expedited.
  • The maximum legal detention period for irregular migrants waiting to be returned will be increased from six months to two years, with an unlimited duration for persons considered as posing a security risk.

““This is a really very important step in making sure that we have control over what is happening in the EU, over who comes but also who has to leave the EU,” Home Affairs Commissioner Magnus Brunner told reporters, including Vincenzo, at the end of the talks.

““The next step is working more on migration diplomacy, together with third countries,” Brunner added, without mentioning in which non-EU countries return hubs could be established.

“The measures, which would have been considered taboo only a few years ago, have been driven by pressure in public opinion and the rapid rise of anti-immigration parties.

“Conservatives across the continent have been increasingly converging with the position of far-right parties, pushing for a tougher approach towards migration.

“The low rate of successfully-executed return orders for migrants with no legal right to stay in the EU has been a growing concern. According to official figures, only 29% of migrants ordered to leave are returned.”

Source: Europe Today

Is that similar to the Torie’s deal with Ruanda?

It would seem so!

We’ll have to wait and see, but I’m hoping that the changes will make oriole any discussion of repealing human rights legislation and leaving the ECHR.

Well, no, it merely provides an option in law to make a deal of some sort. They might look like Rwanda, they might not.

The EU taking back control of its borders, if only we had stayed members of the EU, oh the irony.

2 Likes

Seems to me that this is an officialise way of saying that if you are considering migrating away from some war torn, disease ridden, famine ravaged, economically distressed non EU country, please do not do so in the direction of the EU because we have enough problems of our own already thank you.

What would be really ironic would be if the EU did a deal with the UK for it to take rejected EU refugees in exchange for (say) access to the Single Market. :smiley:

3 Likes

The whole of Essex would be up in arms. :rofl:

Especially if the UK Gov popped them into hotels and B&Bs around Chelmsford. :smiley:

Having spent 20 years living on the London/Essex border, I shall be very unhappy if I get deported from La France to sodding Harlow!

1 Like

Norfolk is better… :+1:

1 Like

It’s supposed to be about returning people to their territory of origin isn’t it? - Rwanda was never about that.

Norfolk is nice, but I prefer Suffolk. :grinning_face: