2020 has been very different for us all,not least using new words and phrases that in 2019 would have raised the question of their meaning. They are now in daily use but will they still be around this time next year. A few to start with:
Lock down
Furlough
Social distancing
Air bridge
Barnard Castle
And the very latest one: Support Bubble
Not forgetting one from last year: Prorogation.
Over to you!
A particular dislike of mine is âgoing forward.â
But, going forward, it seems that social distancing is beginning to give way to social disco dancing.
I have already mentioned elsewhere that Barnard Castle is an obvious candidate for a place in rhyming slang.
Finally, âI think itâs very important,â has become the accepted introduction to some convoluted explanation of why nothing will be done about it.
Furlough isnât new though is it. Nor prorogation. Nor is air bridge, just the significance has shifted.
To bubble (as in (âwho are you going to bubble withâ) makes me laugh, reminds me of hubble bubble cafĂ©sâŠ
I like Skypéro/ing.
The COVID daily briefing brought us at least one â that is a very good questionâ from whomever was/is hosting.
Knowing that all the questions have been vetted prior to the broadcast
Didnt Ms Patel use the word twelvety? Thatâs a new one to me.
âFollowing the scienceâ
âSadlyâ
Guardian headlines in the form ⊠as ⊠where the dots are phrases that are not related, as in - âMarkets fall over fears of long US recovery as Brazil cases top 800,000â
âAs it happenedâ
Good example in todayâs Guardian - âCovid-19 fears for Trump rally as SĂŁo Paulo faces cemetery crisisâ
I thought that the market fell by 7% in the USA because of the sudden leap in infections following the lessening of the restrictions?
I suppose it depends upon what you actually hear.
It makes my lip curl too, Mike. Itâs a stand-in, a look-at-me cut-out with a space-for-a face hole.
It means âI donât think Iâm very important, I know Iâm very important so shut up and be grateful I allow you to hear meâ.
And @Peter_Bird⊠âThatâs really an incredibly important question, Sonya of Walsall, and arenât I the sleaziest, creepyist and arse-lickingist bullshitter you ever wanted to spill your guts onto his shoesâŠ?â
I mean frequent headlines in the style, âJane Posts on forum as Luxembourg sees record rainfallâ, implying that thereâs a connection between the two events, which there isnât.
âThatâs really an incredibly important questionâ and hereâs an unlikely answer I made up earlierâŠ
Hmmm, normally itâs
"Thatâs an incredibly important questionâ
Followed by either:
a) An answer to a completely different question
or
b) Five minutes of waffle which answers no useful question at all.
One new phrase ⊠{insert family member, colleague or friend name} ⊠âYOUâRE ON MUTEâ. And one thatâs now redundant ⊠âIâm just going to pop to the shopâ
In the example you gave there might be, it depends on the subject. If the article was about Coronavirus in the Americas the title would be fine.
New one I heard today (new to me at least) Brexile!
But if the article is about COVID-19 in general where is the problem?
I give up.
I can see where youâre coming from @Fleur (thatâs a late 1980"s bit of corporate management-speak, Peat-Marwick IIRC ) but donât be discouraged: it was a great thread. Even if not everybody cottons onâŠ