I’ve just read on Quora the following, regarding Trump’s claim of absolute immunity, but I haven’t yet found anything elsewhere to confirm this Quora reported decision…. Is this fake news?
The Supreme Court has ruled on the highly anticipated case regarding former President Donald Trump’s claims of immunity from criminal prosecution in a landmark decision that has sent shockwaves through the nation. This ruling will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for the balance of power and the future of American democracy.
According to The Hill on Tuesday June 25, 2024, The case, which has been a subject of intense debate and speculation, centered around the former president’s assertion that he should be granted absolute immunity from any criminal charges related to his actions while in office. Trump’s legal team argued that the unique nature of the presidency and the significant responsibilities it entails should shield the holder from the burden of criminal proceedings, even after they have left office.
However, the Supreme Court, in a majority decision, has firmly rejected this argument. In a scathing rebuke of the former president’s claims, the Court has made it clear that no individual, not even the most powerful leader in the nation, is above the law.
“The presidency is not a license for unchecked criminal behavior,” wrote the Court’s opinion, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts. “The rule of law must be upheld, regardless of the office held by the accused. This decision serves as a crucial check on the executive branch and ensures that no one is immune from the consequences of their actions.”
The implications of this ruling are far-reaching. It means that former President Trump, who has been the subject of numerous investigations and allegations of wrongdoing, can now be held accountable for any criminal activities that may have occurred during his tenure. This includes, but is not limited to, the ongoing investigations into the January 6th Capitol riots, potential financial crimes, and allegations of obstruction of justice.
Legal experts and political analysts have praised the Supreme Court’s decision, viewing it as a decisive victory for the principles of American democracy and the preservation of the system of checks and balances. Many believe that this ruling will have a significant impact on the ongoing political and legal landscape, as it sets a precedent that no individual, regardless of their position of power, is above the law.
“This decision is a resounding affirmation of the fundamental American values of equality and the rule of law,” said Professor Emily Donovan, a constitutional scholar at Harvard University. “It sends a clear message that even the highest-ranking officials in the land must answer for their actions, and that the integrity of our democratic institutions must be protected at all costs.”
Found this, but don’t know of Pulse News…
https://www.todaypulse.news/detail/3ffbc24fa7609e7d4fba08572a851f6d
But as the presidency went on on and she remained on the sidelines it became apparent that that wasn’t going to happen and her abilities, if any, remain unproven.
Mind you, he’s 83! But you wouldn’t know it.
)
) charges just like you would find in Russia etc and not real. The subtlety of hiding payments to porn stars as being an offence might well seem unlikely.