I agree with you about clueless drivers to some extent - but that’s always been a factor - in my 20s I had a collision with a car that turned across my path without looking - the bike was a write-off but I was fortunately uninjured… I don’t think that’s changed, though there is more traffic on the roads than in the 80s.
That said, car drivers in the UK at least do receive better training nowadays than they used to - it was noticeable when I attended a speed awareness course some years ago that most of the attendees were old farts like me. ![]()
As for the price of motorbikes - actually many of them are cheaper in relative terms (leaving aside the high-end exotica).
MCN looked at this topic last year. They found that modern bikes are often cheaper when prices are adjusted for inflation than bikes of 30 years ago.
A couple of examples that they quoted:
1993 Ducati Monster - £7500 new, or £14,943 in 2024 pounds. The equivalent current-spec SP Monster is £13,995 new, so almost a grand cheaper, and has lots of newer tech as well of course.
here’s another comparison which I will quote verbatim:
Sticking with naked bikes, let’s take a look at the latest Honda CB750 Hornet and compare it with the CB600F of 1998. A new Hornet back then would set you back £5245, for which you got a 97bhp, carbed four-cylinder roadster with budget suspension even for the time. In today’s money, £5245 becomes £9425, which means that, if anything, the latest Honda Hornet is over two grand less expensive than it should be.
Source: The true cost of biking: MCN investigates whether motorbikes really are getting more expensive
And that doesn’t take into account the budget brands like Royal Enfield, or the Chinese manufacturers who are turning out fairly decent machines at low prices.
Personally I think the prices for electric cars are where insanity kicks in! ![]()