Too complicated I reckon. It will be a simple “Works with UK SIM” or “Works if originally registered in UK and we last saw a UK IP address “n” days ago or less”
Ah - but the BBC always go for the complicated over the simple 
I don’t mind paying the BBC to be able to listen to BBC Sounds or watch BBC iplayer, as some pay Netflix, Amazon or Disney. I don’t understand why this not an option.
1 Like
Agreed. 
1 Like
I would rather perform oral love, on Ann Widdecombe, than enhance the coffers of the BBC 
.
I’m with @Mirn52. Extra revenue for BBC without spending money on a new complicated set up
1 Like
Mik, my post has been eliminated. I had toned it down. I never used the expression ‘muff dive’ 
1 Like
If that’s your view of toned down I despair - it remains just as offensive. Please choose another description of what you’d “rather do” altogether.
And @Mik_Bennett - edit yours please.
As broad minded as I might be that’s one thing I’d rather not encounter on SF.
1 Like
Sorry but I’m going to have to disagree!
The original post made me smile. Although I subsequently required some mind bleach. …
Assuming that Ms Widdecombe is not a site member iI think we can all relax.
2 Likes
OK
That’s why I haven’t shared the tea shirt slogan I once saw about pullets and coqs on the chicken thread.
I have to say that the mental image is still putting me off my cornflakes but if Cat is happy…
1 Like
Oh it’s put me right off my cornflakes too!!
So the dinner party analogy is abandoned.
I think that’s sad.
1 Like
I think it’s a very fine line, and there’s been no shortage of risqué humour here, but I thought that one was a bit over the line from bawdy into just plain crude. Not that I’m averse to a bit of crude humour but I’ve never really felt this was the place for it.
8 Likes
Agreed.
1 Like
Wilfried has something of a history with Anne Widdecombe and crude posts. I won’t link to his posts, they are easy to find, and he’s a multiple offender.
2 Likes
I seem to remember it was Jeremy Corbyn 
1 Like
With Anne Widdecombe at the same time I believe.
Thanks (not) for ruining what was a perfectly sensible thread. 
3 Likes