How good a job has Bojo and his team done so far

View this email in your browser
Good Law Project
Dear Friend,

Several weeks back we issued judicial review proceedings against Michael Gove for his decision to award an £840,000 contract to associates of his and Dominic Cummings, without any advertisement or competitive tender process.

Last week we got back a letter from Gove’s lawyers, refusing to provide any information about the contract how it was awarded (despite being bound by a duty of candour). Instead they refuse to engage at all with the proceedings - and challenge our right to bring them.

We already knew from his trips to and around Durham that Cummings didn’t think the rules applied to him; does Gove now feel the same?

Well, they may consider themselves above the law, but we do not.

And on Friday 31 July, we filed the fully particularised claim form, with detailed analysis and evidence that firmly underscore the unlawfulness of this award. You can read the documents here.

We believe that the judicial review should succeed for several reasons. First, the Government can’t rely on emergency procurement procedures for services such as focus groups and communications services. Second, it can’t breach procurement safeguards to let a six month contract on the grounds of urgency. And third, there is apparent bias in the grant of this large contract to long-time associates of Gove and Cummings. Importantly, we reserve our position in relation to whether there might be actual bias.

The evidence we have provided show how lucrative the contract was. In the witness statements, we reference conversations with industry specialists, who tell us £840,000 is an “extraordinary”, “crazy” or “insane” price.

Worryingly, these industry experts have also told us that they dare not raise their heads above the parapet to complain publicly, because they fear they will be “punished” by the Government for doing so.

And therein lies the rub. The Government says that we cannot challenge the contract because we don’t have ‘standing’ - the only people who can challenge, it says, are those they have frightened into silence.

But we must and will stand up to them. Procurement rules exist to ensure value for public money; they aim to mitigate bias and prevent croney-ism. Government must not, under cloak of public emergency, hand out large sums of cash to long-time associates.

Thank you,

Jolyon Maugham
Director
Only with your support can we continue to hold the Government to account. If you are in a position to do so, you can make a donation here:

Donate

Copyright © 2020 The Good Law Project, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as you opted in to hear more from the Good Law Project.

Our mailing address is:

The Good Law Project

3 East Point High Street

Seal

Sevenoaks, Kent TN15 0EG

United Kingdom

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

2 Likes

Johnson wasn’t looking good yesterday and Sunak is looking embarrassed. Looks like the Blusterer is running out of steam. Soon we’ll see a bunker parody…! !

DownfallClipScreenshot

IMG_5729

IMG_5728

IMG_5727

2 Likes

A classic example of a face like a smacked arse?

Or a limp dick.

And he seems to be sitting in a “Do Not Sit Here” part of the bench. What a tosser.

1 Like

8 Likes

This made me laugh… “Boris Johnson accuses Extinction Rebellion of trying to limit public access to news”. The news? - the papers affected were the Sun, the Times, the Telegraph and the Daily Mail! What news?

1 Like

Whilst I share the dismay at the performance of the the UK government and Johnson, in particular, I am surprised that there has been little or no discussion of what have been major news items in France recently. “Ensauvagement”, mutilation of horses, gendarmes operating as moral police, Valentin Gendrot’s book “Flic”, the enormous rise in virus cases. For a site most of whose members live in France to find no place for these topics suggests that bashing the UK is a way of ignoring what happens in France. Is it too uncomfortable to be reminded that not all is rosy on your side of the Channel?

The site is divided into threads Ronald - this one is specifically about the performance of the current UK government - there are many others focused entirely on France - I just commented on the ‘Tour de France’ thread, for example.

4 Likes

You can also start threads on any subjects you would like discussed, by the way.

6 Likes

The increase in virus cases has definitely been discussed, although perhaps not with the depth and vigour that the initial discussions about the pandemic generated. I suspect the SF members, like a lot of people are a bit exhausted by the whole Covid thing.

You should have a more thorough search of the site and you will find discussions on horse mutilation and virus increases. If you want to discuss the negative news in France just start your own thread. Or you could just moan that these things aren’t being provided for you.
Izzy x

4 Likes

Ronald, I admire your interest in French current affairs.

Apart from trying to help one another with practical advice relating to living in France, many here also find it interesting to debate what’s happening in the Country of their birth. In these debates, in my opinion, the horror of what is happening in the UK is not ameliorated by unrelated events in France. I think that’s just a distraction, a strategy I’ve often noticed used by the BBC… things are bad in the UK but they are worse in… fill in the country of your choice.

Of course France isn’t perfect, but that’s a separate debate. We have French television, radio, newspapers, both national and local, to keep us up to speed on those issues, which do often make their way onto this forum. The Gilet Jaunes for example. You may like to start a thread yourself :slightly_smiling_face:

3 Likes

As the others said Ronald, start your own threads. People will contribute if they find the topic interesting.

For example, what do you think about the current state of the race for the next a Presidential elections ? The Republicans look like they could sell their souls to Macron in exchange for political office. That’s worrying imo.

Quote in the New York Times from Douglas Bannister, chief executive of the port of Dover: “I am very, very confident that there will be no disruption on January 1st, primarily because it’s a bank holiday. But January 2nd may be a different question.”

I think I would be concerned about the steady progress of right wing populism which could give Mme Le Pen a way into the Élysée.

I mainly read the General Discussion as it seems to be the place where current affairs are aired and I did search other threads, maybe not very well. I am not a great starter of new topics.

there you go…

An old joke, tweaked for our times and culled from someone with more time on the hands than I do on Twitter

The old ones, as they say, are the best ones.

8 Likes

Well I read it all the way through. Aren’t jokes supposed to make you laugh?

As if on cue, Mme Le Pen has begun to ratchet up the discussion on security.

Raise a wry smile at least :slight_smile:

posted that yesterday - you obviously have a problem with observation :grin: