In hindsight, Starmer was a terrible choice

It should be a capital offence, or at least banishment to Siberia (though I hear it is quite nice this time of year) failing to answer the question put.
I have had to mute the ears of my radios to protect them from loud mouthed and frustrated abuse by the current inhabitant of this space. :rofl:

2 Likes

Still, his great, great, great , great grandson reads a good weather forecast!!

1 Like

What a sad indictment -

Labour was not prepared to govern in 2024, says Morgan McSweeney | Labour | The Guardian

14 years in opposition and still not enough time to work out what to do.

2 Likes

Not a shock considering they can’t agree of a definition of “woman” might be.

1 Like

I think Burnham has the makings of being even vaguer, on that topic.

And he won’t take questions, so it seems doesn’t like to be challenged.

1 Like

Proved it, running away from questions in his previous national job, Health Secretary.

1 Like

Like a dog chasing a car.

1 Like

Honeymoon over rather quickly ?

1 Like

Maybe the hot weather making people crotchety?

I strived to provide evidence to my old London borough constituency to get onto its electoral register as an overseas voter, as many of us did, to vote in the UK general election two years ago. Received a reminder today that my registration as an overseas voter needs to be renewed before Nov 1st 2026, which I’ve done.

When will the next UK general election take place I wonder?

Given the half live of prime ministers at the minute I’d guess bonfire night.

1 Like

Burnham is being advised by Louise Haigh (Minister Louise Haigh quits after fraud offence revealed Transport secretary Louise Haigh quits after fraud offence revealed - BBC News), so I think you’re right.

Apparently MacSweeney didn’t like her - she was too clever