And there are likely to be other things that you can do to mitigate your risk with much larger effects. In my case almost certainly coming down from 135kg (only my height saves me - just - from morbid obesity) and cutting the ethanol consumption.**
**: 10kg off and counting, now below 125 Pity I still have 35kg to go
Being an IBS sufferer, one of the many things I was told to cut out of my diet were artificial sweeteners. Better to reduce your sugar intake than replace it with chemicals!
It may have started off as tree bark but it goes through a whole lot of processing to extract the sugars but thats still not really the point, despite most of it no longer coming from birch bark but synthesised in a lab its still artificial. Its added as an emulsifier and sweetner that if you have your bodies original natural sweetness levels isnt required. Due to the constant consumption of sugar sweetened stuff the body adapts and alters the levels of reception so what some find nice and sweet to me for example I would find insipid. It may only play a small part in destroying peoples health over many years but its only tested on its own, not in combination with other unnatural additives also on their own only a little bit of damage then add a few more only doing a little damage (long list of additives on fake food packaging) all just doing a little dammage over a long period of time. One issue I have with the control trials is their brevity, some are just 12 weeks, others maybe a year or more because they are costly but when you consider people eating is never the portion size mentioned on the packet, multiple time a week in some cases and over 30-40 years then you end up with a thread posting about all the medicines people are taking.
Just to add, its concern over the number of meds people are taking not a criticism.
take your point but I meant in the context of not part of the original food stuff. Also with synthesis the developers are often only focussing on one aspect not as the original natural makeup would have been.