That’s interesting. I don’t think my immediate assumption would be “gay”, but I’ve always believed my gaydar is quite sensitive—and I’ve always got on well with gay people, despite a complete lack of fashion sense.
I think the world finds dealing with couples easier, and perhaps couples can view single people as a threat.
Not saying he should have been prosecuted for what he did, but he was prosecuted, convicted and fined for gross indecency. Sex with then underage male prostitutes.
Edit: This was in the 1980’s and unrelated to the later investigations.
Most of my gay friends are tweedy happily married couples, some are less tweedy and more muscle Maryish but they are a minority. But obviously I’m quite old and so are the majority of my friends.
My mom warned me against single men who lived with their mothers into their 30’s, nothing to do with their sexuality, she just thought it lead to weird men.
She also said, when at 17 I was without a boyfriend, " the best china gets left on the shelf, only the mugs get used".
There is a small but distinct minority of men who have little interest in sex, and although they might marry because of relationship and have sex for children, it really isn’t of interest. It’s entirely conceivable Heath would fit that category, and was happy to be able to focus on getting on in politics rather than being nagged by his willy.
Zack Polanski could be the next politician in trouble, council tax or a possible voter registration offence. The Times and Dan Neidle’s people have dug this up.