I stand corrected, & a bit of websearching has confirmed things.
However, even if you used the efficiency of the record holding marine engines for a car, then you still lose half of your fuel as heat.
Clearly variable speed driving & short periods of use make car engines very much less efficient than laboratory figures might say, so losing between two thirds to three quarters of your fuel to heat is a real possibility for many motorists.
The 50% plus figure for marine diesels is partly because they are usually run at constant rpm for long periods. Cars are not as efficient, but can still manage over 40%, although it does depend on the weight of your right foot
We also have in the real world the rear trim panels which are never optimised and act like a drag increasing parachute so bench mounted efficiency would never compare.
I do wonder why, if they were tested with “great success” nearly 10 years ago why they are still 5 to 10 years away for a commercial offering? I hope we’re not into Nuclear fusion territory here…