For quite some time I have been complaining about pills which are essentially the same but have different manufacturer names. I simply cannot understand why governments do not consider this dangerous.
Case in point today. I went to the pharmacie as usual on a Monday to top up the ones I will be short of next Monday. An argument followed.
Almost 25 years ago I had a serious problem with reflux and was given a drug called Pariet which said it was gastro-resistant. No problem since and various doctors have always renewed the prescription. A couple of years ago, after my heart attack I began to receive a whole host of other stuff and by this time Pariet wasn’t always the name on the packet. Both Rabeprazole and Pantoprazole were given to me by the pharmacie staff. I gave up asking if this was the same stuff as always the answer was yes.
To make things easier at home I clip open each box so they fit nicely in one bag. This means that after I do this from time to time different named pills reside in the same box, and today and since at least 6 months that box is named Pantoprazole. Nobody objects to this as I always take the empty box with me.
Today the fellow said that what was on my prescription was not what that box had in it. I explained for the umpteenth time that I know that but was given that box full at some point and since then it has always been renewed in it, whatever the latest company called their product. He often lapses into Peter Sellers English and this time it was ‘zat is nut ze zame’. ‘Is it Pariet’ I asked. ‘Yes it is’ was the reply, ‘so what is the problem I have always had my pills from here and at some point someone gave me this box saying that it was the same.’ He refused to believe that I had been given it there.
He checked the computer and said I had never got that from there but I think what has happened is that previous assistants have been sloppy and not recording the change of product while airily assuring me that all was ok.
But the whole point is that why on earth is something so important allowed to be so confusing this way? I think I have always been given the right stuff, but how can I be sure, if this bloke is telling the truth I could have been dead by now, from a throat dissolved in acid wrongly allowed to rise from my stomach.
If I was a French citizen I would be writing to my MP about it rather than droning on here.
EDIT: Obviously I have asked this question before, or someone has, because both names popped up on the screen before I had finished the first. They do the same thing but are not exactly the same but, the one he rejected today works better with people taking multiple drugs, for instance blood thinners. ![]()
Guess who takes blood thinners. ![]()