But it’s easy to talk about an elected upper chamber if you don’t get into the detail where the devil is.
Would you advocate election by the same ‘first past the post’ system the UK has for the Commons? If so, what’s the point? But if you try for a more democratic electoral arrangement, you lay the ground for ongoing constitutional crises, because the upper chamber would claim to be more legitimate than the Commons.
Or would you have more of a delegate system like France?
See my post on different systems of democracy in the ‘Truss’ thread…