I was reading this and thought it might interest people thinking of buying riverside properties etc…
3 Likes
That’s very interesting. It’s not adhered to in several places along the Adour river.
possibly a case of " let sleeping dogs lie… until someone complains."
but important for a new/possible Owner to be aware of the fact that Owning doesn’t necessarily mean it’s Private 
Something to be thoroughly sure about, before agreeing to buy.
1 Like
That’s interesting as it may explain a situation that has erupted with one of my neighbours. I live at the end of a road near where it reaches the river. At the end there’s a loop similar to a roundabout. At the end is a farm with their entrance being one of the exits off the ‘roundabout’. There is a public right of way through their courtyard and down a chemin that stops short of the river. I always found that odd. I could understand why there might have been a right of way to the river itself but this one stops at the field before the river. A few years ago the farm owners bought a tumbledown house on the opposite side of the road to the farm and immediately put up Private Property signs, one of them which also warns people about dangerous dogs. A quick look at the cadastral plan showed that part of the roundabout part of the road was not on public land but belonged to the tumbledown house. I thought it an odd decision but it doesn’t affect me in any way as I enter and leave my property before reaching the private bit. It did annoy others though and the Maire got involved. He was unhappy because the new private road had been maintained by the commune forever and there is a street light on it as well. The farm owners stood their ground. There was a bit more fuss when the unoccupied house behind the farm was sold because the farm owners claimed that the seller had no right of access across their land. Luckily for the seller he produced a deed from when his wife’s great grandfather had bought the house clearly stating access was allowed. I couldn’t understand why so much fuss was being made by people who didn’t live in the hamlet because very few of them would have been inconvenienced and the right of way to nowhere seemed irrelevant. This article might explain the missing link as it suggests that the right of way would have actually been to the river itself not a dead end.
Most anglers are aware of this right and I am aware of several confrontations it has caused. When it comes to exercising ones rights, be it on the riverbank, on the highway or anywhere else, my personal guideline is - the French always have right of way. That way my life runs very smoothly.
1 Like
We had the same situation at a riverside property. When we bought it there was a narrow strip of land some 80 cm wide that led from the highway to the river which was owned by tge commune. On the ground it was virtually non existent other than some steps at the bottom of the garden where it met the river. The vendor’s assured us that the path was never used and indeed throughout our ownership it never was.
When we sold 10 years later its existence was questioned by the purchaser and it looked at the time that the sale wouldn’t go through.
It was a public right of way to fish in the river and even though never used during our ownership the purchasers claimed rightly that it still could be.
Fortunately the purchasers were local and ‘in’ with the Mairie and lo and behold after some behind closed door discussion the public right of way became part of the 3 cadastral sections of land that formed the property.
An age old right of way that common sense thankfully dictated was no longer relevant.
1 Like
Excellent outcome for you !
Here. we’ve a few footpaths across fields etc which can pass right in front of someone’s front door… 
In most cases (but not always) , with strategic negotiations, said footpath gets closed and another made available elsewhere… 
It’s the knowing before buying… which is important… in my opinion.