3 hours is enough time to stand in line at the Louvre on a bad day in summer
Musee D’Orsay is better anyway but for 3 hours it’s a lot more suitable - the Q isn’t as bad - it’s better organised and you can see art rather than tourists. The Louvre is organised by filling every room to the brim at random then packing visitors in like sardines.
Sounds awful.
We were last there about 12 years ago and didn’t experience anything like that.
I reckon we must have had luck on our side, that last visit was organised by our Parisien Club..
So many, many happy memories of Paris and its surroundings, introduced to us by those who had lived there nearly all their lives
For a Paris morning of light and colour, I’d suggest:
Monet’s Water Lilies in the Orangerie - For me the culmination of Post-Impressionism - they’re also a great bridge between C19th painting and what was to come
Then if it’s a sunny day, walk to Sainte-Chapelle which is an exquisite architectural jewel.
But OTOH it would help our suggestions, if we knew a little more about your interests…
I take your point, OTOH a couple of times I’ve been in Sainte-Chapelle on free Sundays when it’s inevitably crowded, but that’s not too problematic because unlike in an art gallery the main spectacle is above you.
Regardless of the specifics IMO there’s a lot to be said for visiting a couple of smaller places with a break in between rather than slogging round somewhere for two or three hours, with your eyes glazing over.
I’m travelling by train (my first in France) from Angoulême to Montparnasse. I’ll stay overnight and take the Eurostar to London the next day. If the train journey goes well then I’ll keep the Louvre visit et al for a spring or autumn visit. But I’ll still try Notre dame and saint chappell.
Having just read Geoffrey’s comment, I was immediately going to recommend Raft of the Medusa as well. I saw it many years ago and it is definitely spectacular. And not the crowds around it like with some other, much less interesting paintings. Went to the Louvre last year but didn’t go to see any paintings, went to see all the ancient history exhibitions and was there several hours.
Agreed. IIRC it is directly across from David’s Coronation of Napoleon, which is one of my all-time favorites. That whole room of 19th century French art is impressive. I could sit there for hours.
Thanks for all your comments on the Louvre which I will keep for September. I’ve booked a hotel close to the Luxembourg gardens and booked a seat at a concert in Saint-Julien-le-Pauvre for one evening. It’s just 10 minutes walk from my hotel. It should make a pleasant change from being buried in the countryside but I think two afternoons will be enough
Very important to plan to your own pace and not try to tick off things because they are there.
I stopped off in Paris on way to London and booked for the Annette Messager at musée de la chasse et nature (sadly I think she has now passed her prime). The next morning I went to Clair-Obscur at the Bourse de Commerce which is a wonderful building, and then nipped into the Memorial de la Shoah on the way to the train for an exhibition on Simone Veil and her family.
One thing in morning and one in afternoon is the max for me now.
So just a couple of things here in London now before I head back on Sat.
Don’t overdo it - especially need some energy for navigating Montparnasse station which is not well organised.
I think if one’s looking ‘hard’ at something, sometimes one or two paintings or whatever can be enough. When I worked in the West End (my one only ‘real job’ in a lifetime otherwise spent in academe) I’d often pop into the National Gallery and just look at one painting. Of course if one’s paid a lot to get in it’s a different matter.