The first Control Technique test I submitted our 2013 Honda CR - V for the owner pointed out that the existing headlights were illegal as they were designed for right hand drive use.
After some discussion in my best French and a couple of jars of my wife’s home made jam, it was agreed that if I returned the following day with some of the stick on beam blockers he would fit them and pass the vehicle.
30 minutes later the car was returned with the “unopened” pack on the front passenger seat and the new CT sticker on the screen.
Having moved house in the intervening two years I took the car to our local CT station for the test. I received a catalogue of faults including the headlights, shock absorbers, rusted chassis broken mirror etc; et:
When I mentioned the stick on beam deflectors the owner was adamant that they were unnaceptable.
Also having paid 96 euros for the CT test I was also told that after the car was repaired I would be charged a further 25 euros to check the remedial work.
Having read the extremely useful articles on this subject I researched and printed out the relevant regulation in both French and English stating that they were acceptable.
I also had the stickers checked by the HOnda main dealers who confirmed in writing that they met the requirements on their headlight geometry system completely.
The rest of the vehicle was thoroughly checked including the shock absorbers and chassis etc; and all was found to be perfectly acceptable.
Having made enquiries locally with other English residents, everyone said that the owner hates the English with a vengeance and boasts in the local bars that he never passes an English vehicle if he can possibly avoid it.
On the advice of other locals I submitted the vehicle to a different CT station this week where it passed with flying colours.
So here I sit with enough evidence to prove without any doubt whatsoever that this guy has lied.
However, my good lady wife has pointed out that we live in a small country village where everyone talks to everyone,
She is concerned that we would undoubtedly win the battle, but in doing so we could alienate ourselves in the process.
One English guy pointed out this week that like us when he first arrived he took his car there which was failed repeatedly, the last time was for a tear in the material of the front seat.
At the moment my thoughts are to simply never use the business again and to warn other off from it.
Many thanks for the folks who already contributed on this subject that I found very helpful.
I hope that this salutory tale helps others to avoid getting drawn into spending many thousands on replacement headlights when they are not necessary.
Kind regards
Pat Quinn