Most people with pseudonyms tend to use one that isn’t considered offensive.
But you joined the site less than a week ago and this is your first post…
and maybe his last
it may be Graham - like I said, the last time I posted something which challenged the government narrative of this state of affairs, it was blocked immediately and my former account dissabled.
What else should I expect.
Perhaps I should stick to posting photos of my cat - but not in the ‘only photos only of dogs’ category’ I promise. That would be a bridge too far.
Sorry if I have upset anyone by my pseudonym, or by my suggestion to challenge the media narrative. We are in very bad times and we need to answer for our actions - or innaction.
Then do the right thing as required by the site owners and give your proper first and last name. No-one will take you seriously in the meantime.
I don’t think you are being clever, just stupid.
We have had a Funky Gibbon and a Juan King in the space of a few days
If you don’t like the club rules, don’t join
Hi Juan…
Are you refusing to comply with the request for your proper name… first and last…???
I’m not sure that removed accounts are encouraged or even allowed to rejoin under a different name TBH.
Under what name did @james remove your account?
not at all Stella.
After all I am sure you are not singling me out by asking me to not use my pseudonym just because some here do not like their view challenged.
My real name is Andrew Deakon - but you can call me Andy.
**
Point already made!
What rule is that Graham - the one which says that only the views of the many are welcome?
Andrew … please try to be less aggressive…
The Club Rules are manifold and include using proper names…
do you see what precident that would set?
We have total censorship on facebook, youtube the bbc et al, surely we should allow polite opinions from all comers on SFN?
Stella, i will hapilly remove my pseudonym as it may cause offence to some sensitive persons, but you are wrong to say that I have been aggressive.
My views are challenging I agree but they have not been presented in an aggressive manor.
You can’t even agree on the spelling of Deacon
that’s my fault Eddie… trying to listen to the Sénat and deal with this rubbish… is doing my head in and my typing suffers… sorry…

and my former account dissabled.
IIRC there was no member with that name removed by @james in recent times.
I fear this person is only here to cause upset