It’s been printed. It almost the length of a bed ! It looks fine, as far as res is concerned. From anything more than 1.5/2m it’ll look gt.
Your colleague is right. I have seen [on screen] examples of prints 2m wide shot on 4/3 format cameras. To view such prints one must be some distance away or one will be like a spectator at WImbledon - swivel left, swivel right, swivel left, swivel right
This is what they have on this image
I don’t think this image has had any fettling in Lightroom. If so, it can be improved because this is from a jpeg not a RAW file. That must be in a laptop still to be unpacked - I’ve only been in this house 13 months!
Their thumbnail is cropped from this, which is the actual print format.
I had to have the angle of the paving up front, the two pigeons on the rt and the lamp post on the left. But there is yet more on the original image, esp on the right, where a whole fags n newspapers kiosk has been cropped out. I s’pose that’s how we get from 10.5 Mb down to 1,66Mb for this print.
I’m not very up on dpi and x by y pixels and all that post data. I just try to max out on quality when shooting with a camera. This shot was on a Nik 600 so FX.
I now have Olympus 4/3. The quality is remarkable, for the size of the sensor. The trick is, with 4/3, to get as close to or spot on Cartier-Bresson’s rule: ‘No cropping’, thus maxing out on what the image can give. 3 x 2 is so ingrained in my vision now that that’s not a problem. Wider is OK also, as per this shot.
I must now paint the wall it will go on a dark grey - maybe the Fallow and Ball tone 'Normandy Grey’ would be most appropriate. I must look it up. Mounted with a thin white border, should look spiffing.