Learning from Commercial Art

Well, let’s see how we go - fingers crossed and all that!

It may seem strange to talk about ‘Learning from commercial art’, as others have said before Commercial Art has never been regarded as ‘proper art’ in many circles. Yet it is the Art that we are most exposed to every day of our lives. From packaging to posters, from brochures to magazines, postcards to postage stamps, and even the humble letterhead or business card to the most elaborate crests and signage. From Truck sides to restaurant menus, from Holiday brochures to book matches, from logos, pictogramms and emojis - the list is endless.

When you read a sign, or a direction of a newspaper, or even TV commercials. Commercial Art is there. So why shouldn’t we learn from these things as much as other forms of Art?

Commercial Art is merely art that has been prepared for a product purpose and paid for. Most if not all Fine Artists were in fact ‘commercial’ in one way or another. We have all been hired to produce something for someone else and get paid for it. Picasso, Renoir, Toulouse-Lautrec, Degas and others all produced works that were ‘commercial’. Theophile Steinlen, and a host of others may not be so well-known by name, but their works are recognisable by almost everyone.

Commercial Art is of course very much part of Marketing and Advertising. In the not so distant past Illustration was a BIG part of Commercial Art. Naturally the same can be said of Copywriters - those who write the words for the advertisements we see for just about everything. Almost every day we open our letterboxes to brochures from Supermarkets, and local retailers. Sales Promotions are an arm of Commercial Art. We mostly say we ‘hate the stuff’, or ‘I never look at the trash’, but that is simply not true. The evidence is the mere fact tha we still keep getting them, and in an industry that makes a point about not wasting money that speaks for itself. We DO read them, We DO react to them, we DO note the Specials and a great many create their weekly shopping lists from them.

We all hate the posters that line the routes, highways and byways. Many despise the ‘visual pollution’ of neon signs etc;, etc - until we want to find somewhere, or visit a city. Of course there is rubbish and poor quality, but we cannot deny that Commercial Art resonates with us on a daily basis.

It may come as a surprise that the average City Dweller is exposed to something like 5-8,000 advertising messages each and every day! On a 24 hour day that makes 333 messages every hour, or almost 6 messages every minute.

we know our average attention span is between 8-10 seconds.

Check this out for yourselves - it is an interesting experiment. Try to just look at something directly for ten seconds without moving your eyes or head away from the image - even IF that image is moving as with a ‘talking head’ Look at a TV Commercial, or Film time the changes of direction of the cameras (editing). You may be surprised.

Now think about those things that cannot be edited as they are static, usually printed materials. Our attention span remains the same, so how do we work with this?
This is where the skill of Commercial Artists come in. They create ‘movement’ where none exists in reality. We get the observer’s eyes to do the movement for us.

There are a few little guidelines that we use, and the most popular one is called AIDA - yes just like the opera, but Different. We use these letters to provide a structure for a piece of Commercial Art. A- Attract (the attention, I- Inform and Interest, D- create the Desire for the product, and A- get Action (o buy).
Note the sequence.

Beyond this we get into all the Motivational bits which are really outside the scope of this topic. I created a Focus Form which I called the 'Magic Questions - What? Why? Who? Where? When? and How? all part of the process.

I intend in this blog to concentrate on Poster Designs over the period of 1850-1950. Why?

The dates are not arbitrary, they cover the period where Posters as a Commercial Art form were created mainly by hand - at least the Art was. No computers, and almost no photography for the first 50 years. The Illustrator was important - hugely so, but the Designer even more so. He or she 'constructed the whole image/work, and decided which techniques could best serve the story or presentation (the sales pitch).

We need to consider one other aspect about Posters. Most media at these times was designed to be taken with the reader - newspapers, leaflets, brochures etc. It was mobile for the educated. But even though to the early 1920s the average person was not that literate.
Most responded to ‘pictures’ and what we now call Pictograms.

The obvious ones are the signage on shops and stores - Hairdressers had their red white an d blues stripe poles, and or Scissors and Combs for imagery, the Baker showed Bread, the Butcher and animal’s head. Boxes would and still use ‘Up and Down arrows’ or a broken wine glass to depict fragility. The list is endless, but even the most illiterate could understand what it meant. Wonderfully they usually worked across linguistic divides as a bonus.

By the 1850s we were seeing rapid improvements in printing techniques meaning more posters could be produced quickly and cheaply albeit still usually in single colour and just words. Technological advances came thick and fast in the mid-to late 19th century, not least of which in printing. I will not digress into paper at this time as there was little option to the cheaper and coarser types until into the 20th Century. Art for Art’s sake was expensive to produce, and it wasn’t until the Impressionists and the slightly earlier Nabi Art Movements experimented with other surfaces. Toulouse-Lautrec with card and Kraft paper being a good example. We will revisit this area in later blogs.

My intention will be to relate Commercial Art to the times in which they appeared. This may cause a little confusion as although almost ALL art was produced with some commercial intent we see the abstraction of time being equated to an Art Style. We talk about the Belle Epoch as the era of Art Nouveau, and Art Deco as the Roaring Twenties era, but we don’t do the reverse. Later as with the Austrian Recessionists and even the Impressionists, these démarcations became confused.

It has been necessary to introduce the subject in this way and lay out a bit of a map for what is to follow

Stay tooned!!

2 Likes

On the distinction between commercial and ‘proper’ art:
Many years ago, my PhD thesis was focused on Fitzgerald’s ‘Great Gatsby’ but was really about the relationship between literary and commercial production - Fitzgerald was corresponding with his publisher about the book before he finished it, and received a cover design, which he subsequently incorporated into the text - where it became one of the most analysed ‘artistic’ passages.
I thought you might be interested, Norman, in this evidence for your opening point: that the line between commerce and ‘Art’ is not nearly as clear as most people think it is…

2 Likes

Thanks Geof, on two levels - 1, that is showed me it had actually appeared, as I admit to wondering!
Yes, I am hoping to be neutral as far as possible from being totally a ‘commercial’ one for most of my life. I will be moving into the Art Eras in the next Blog, and talk about where and when these appeared, and include examples.
Let’s see what other reactions appear to my suggested structure.

Hi Norman - for some reason you came up in the General category, so I changed it to Blog. Hope that is OK.

To add to your Blog, you will simply need to hit the big Reply key each time you are ready to post more info and delights… :relaxed::relaxed:

Thank you once again Stella. I did look at the reply icon, but thought ‘why would I reply to myself?’ - so thought it was a bit of techie magic, when all the time it was my Guardian Angel!!

1 Like

Stay tooned @Norman_Clark

So far, so fascinating! :smiley:

Hi Peter, well it has certainly been a complete fascination for me,
for the majority of my life.

I just hope I can pass on just a little of this to others.

Part Two

Still not sure if I am doing this correctly - but I know there is a Guardian Angel on my shoulder (thank you Stella), who will hopefully not feel too imposed upon when I stumble!

In Part One, I briefly mentioned Art and Eras. Although not an ‘absolute’ it is still reasonable to say that most ‘Movements’ were if not dictated by Commerce, were certainly developed by it - notably artists still needed to earn some money. Few were dilettantes.

Most of us if asked to name major art movements from say Victorian times to the mid 1950s, could probably recognise maybe half-a-dozen starting with Art Nouveau and ending with Art Deco

Here are typical examples of both:

Now if I have done this correctly it will be blindingly obvious that even though the subject matter is basically the same - Rail Travel, the art style is vastly different.

However it is not as simple as it appears, as if we only take 12 broad categories of Movements
there are significant différences between countries. Taking Art Nouveau it is not the same everywhere - even though the same era is involved. American, German (Jugendstil), Glasgow, Vienna Secession, Italian and of course French & Belgian styles are all different. If we look at Art Deco then it gets even more complex as we have to include East European countries - Hungary and Russia, plus Dutch and Swiss.
So even in these two main categories we have vast réservoirs of styles, techniques and approaches. Happily Commercial Art really couldn’t give a toss about eras etc and will dance around in all directions in pursuit of the first A in Aida - Attract the Attention!

How many of us have visited Exhibitions of Professional and keen Amateur works, and come away with an ominous sense of ‘sameness’ about the offerings? For me at least - far too many. People seem locked into ‘conventional wisdoms’ and mediums. Yet if we were not the ones producing, we would also be looking for the unusual or different. So why do so many trap themselves in the mundane? Watercolours are probably the most popular medium, but all too often the works do not exploit the medium. Most get justifiably excited about the possibilities of ‘wet in wet’ then lose the courage to do it boldly. The Victorian ladies pale colors are still with us, and can have charm, and i am not suggesting that everybody thrashes about like mad things trying to make watercolours look like Gouache.
Most artists amateur and professionals are also tied to ‘realism’. This is understandable as most are comfortable with this, as are the people who regard the works. It is the safest route in many ways. It is easier to judge if an apple looks like an apple in a still life. But even with this restriction, if that’s what it is the interpretation can be different with experimentation.

Commercial Artists were often faced with the most mundane of products from which they somehow had to create and grab ‘Attention’ - often in a very crowded arena. Very few poster sites were ‘solus’. Most were shared with an often haphazard array of competition for the elusive ‘attention’


Soon styles of boldness and even crassness fought for attention - not everyone was a designer! Posters posted over other people’s works, and soon there really was visual pollution that affected even the best.
This was to change in the late 1890’s and one man is universally credited with that - Jules Cherét. The Man who brought colour t the Streets of Paris and ultimately the world.

In the next Blog (assuming this bit has worked out OK!) I will investigate and demonstrate what this really meant.

1 Like

Hmm, well not knowing quite what to expect it is bit hard to judge, but the blog doesn’t seem to be attracting much interest. That’s fair enough, but I will hold off on Part 3 as I might be doing some overkill. I think there’s probably enough to mull over for those interested, but I don’t think there are many fascinated by the subject itself.

Norman - you have had 97 views. :hugs:

You just keep going, slowly, as and when the mood takes you.

I wish you would put some of your Horse pictures on here - let folk learn from them.

Norman I love Art Deco especially the architecture.

You shouldn’t get too concerned about not getting responses to or comments on your blog, Norman. I read them occasionally and find them very readable and enjoyable.

It’s partly the specialist content and your knowledge of the historicity of commercial art, and how it has developed as an intrinsic part of commerce, industry, and social science over many years. And it’s also your own personality that expresses itself quite vividly in the writing and in the illustrations you have done yourself.

It also seems to meet a need in you, and the intricacies of that are interesting to me, your changing moods, your uncertainties, your enthusiasms and your muted sorrows. All good nourishing stuff for your followers. But don’t rely on them for too much inspiration or encouragement. Write because you can and want to, that’s enough I think.

1 Like

As ever Stella, Peter, thanks for the comments. As I said in the opener of the last posting ‘not knowing quite what to expect’ is probably salient. Despite being seen as a bit (lot) doddery and out of sync. I am in fact very organised when I take on a project. As with my Lectures it was always a step-by-step process - laying down the groundwork and then working up from there. Maybe that’s too organised for a blog, as obviously some spontaneity gets lost.
My thinking such as it has been, was to open up and identify certain now-forgotten styles of Graphic Art and even mediums used, and see how these could provide a new (old/revisited) way of looking at people producing their own art. Yes, I would/will use examples of my own work where appropriate, and also share some ‘tricks of the trade’ although I never thought of them as tricks.
As will be revealed, I have a tendency to work in ‘series’ - and this needs pragmatic organisation to ensure continuity. Most people don’t do this, but nonetheless some things regarded as ‘tricks and shortcuts’ were used by Fine Artists since year dot.

However I think you are right, and that maybe I am approaching this too much as a series of Lectures, which is not what people are looking for.

Hard to break old habits!

1 Like

I’m reading your blogs Norman and learning, but at the moment it has to be early morning as It’s way too bloody hot for me to concentrate! They are interesting and don’t worry about the delivery, if they sound a bit like lectures so be it, it’s your style, a bit like listening to my OH :slight_smile:

1 Like

Yes, I think Art Deco is probably in some ways the easiest to recognise, and a lot of residual use is still made of it. Not least being in the revival in a style called Memphis which flowered in about the mid-190s - mid 1980s. This massively drew on Art Deco for inspiration
Yet as mentioned earlier Art Deco is also varied by country source. Deco is of course shortened from ‘Decorative’ and used widely in Industries seeking ‘modernity’ at the time. Possibly one of the most famous being the Chrysler Building in New York. Staying in America Pennsylvania Railroads made huge use of it in their engines, and at the other end came Art Deco Jewellery and fashion I will dig out a few refs and at them to this post as an addendum.

1 Like

He must be a dam’ fine chap!!

1 Like

My observations, for what they’re worth:

This is not a Blog in the classic sense because it has quickly turned into a discussion thread.

If you are seeking to inform and entertain your audience there needs to be more pictures, lots of them. Pure text is somewhat stale and people lose interest very quickly unless they share your passion.

Stop worrying about numbers - It can easily lead to disappointment and dent one’s confidence. You should be producing it for your own pleasure and enjoyment - if people like it that’s a bonus.

A Blog, in my opinion, should be like producing a 'coffee table" book - people can dip into it occasionally or read it from cover to cover.

Whether you produce it monthly, weekly or daily is immaterial as long as it doesn’t become a stressful hassle - Don’t over think it, enjoy it.

When giving lectures l would use slides and PowerPoint to keep my subject fresh and interesting - Your illustrations are, l believe, what the SF membership would love to see more of. Do not bury us in lengthy and wordy text.

I love Ettore Sotsass

Hi Dan,

thanks for that and I am sure you are right. Always the danger of being obsessed with something so much and assuming others might share it! I should have been more aware.

I think now I will go to the ‘meat’ which is to show the different techniques that people might have forgotten or never knew.

Thanks again!

2 Likes

Norman,

Thanks for sharing your enthusiasm for the history of Commercial Art. I’ve read it and thought for a while before posting the following response. You seemed to want feedback on your blog and I hope you won’t be too offended by the following advice from a retired academic who’s written several undergrad courses on the history of visual culture and who continues to publish on this subject.

  1. Firstly, play to your strengths and experience - I understand that you were a commercial artist - a practitioner, not an academic - so concentrate on conveying understandings gained from your perspective, for instance by just posting a simple personal comparative analysis of two seemingly similar examples, rather than an unstructured, rambling ‘history of everything’.

  2. Don’t give your audience too much information at once - online bite sized chunks work best.

  3. I think a dedicated web site would be a far better vehicle for your blog than Survive France because you’d reach a much wider, global, and yet more specialised audience. It could also be a lot of fun to design the site. However, before going public, I’d also advise that you did more rigorous research because your blogs contain a number of factual errors. I research and check everything scrupulously before posting anything online because it stays there forever, it is exposed to world-wide scrutiny and if it contains errors, can undermine everything else that you’ve ever written.

Lastly, perhaps consider if ‘Commercial Art’ is the best title for your blog. In the UK this term began to fall into disuse in the Sixties when art colleges began offering new degree equivalent qualifications (Dip AD) in graphics, illustration and typography. I’d suggest something along the lines of ‘Visual Culture’ or ‘2D Printed Ephemera’ might give it a more contemporary feel

I certainly don’t want to give offence with any of the above observations, but I feel your energy, enthusiasm and knowledge are currently not being directed to best effect. Play to your strengths and specialist understandings,

Good luck,

Mark