I follow Rick Beato on YT. This is a recent video, in which he compares current (US, I think) chart music to 1973.
His conclusions will probably not surprise you.
https://www.youtube.com/live/KphPa_i2VXE?si=uuSN6Q_95-ulNOTX
I follow Rick Beato on YT. This is a recent video, in which he compares current (US, I think) chart music to 1973.
His conclusions will probably not surprise you.
https://www.youtube.com/live/KphPa_i2VXE?si=uuSN6Q_95-ulNOTX
I was discussing this with one of the 20somethings I work with last week. Itâs pretty much what they said.
A TL;DR(DW?) would be helpful.
I think that was the thread title.
Sorry - itâs as @Ancient_Mariner said!
Apart from the songs where the production was good (but the song wasnât), and two decent songs (Olivia Rodrigo and Taylor Swift), the rest of the chart was lazy and banal and you couldnât ever imagine covers of most of the current songs.
Thereâs plenty of great music being produced today, but whatâs in the charts isnât it.
Curious that, in an age of much greater choice, the quality of what is popular has greatly diminished.
It was ever thus. The Birdie Song charted higher than much better music. Punk was a cynical scam that devalued ability and promoted stupidity etc.
The masses will buy faeces over quality because itâs what they are conditioned to do.
The great majority of my music is from the 1980s as I was very lucky that there was excellent music of every genre being made during my late teens-early twenties.
Thereâs been small outbreaks of originality every once in a while since (Madchester, BritPop, Grunge etc.), but itâs mostly been utter ****.
I had assumed that the video would say that the reason for this is because music is made for algorithms these days, not humans. The chart is often based off streams, and to get streams is a very different skill than to organically get listens.
ââTwas ever thus, through the ages the vast majority of music and art has been quite forgettable and the charts have never really been a reflection of good music as opposed to popular music.
Itâs easy to look back and cherry pick what we oldies remember as good and quite often itâs not what we liked at the time. Itâs a bit harder to forecast what todayâs generation will remember because thereâs lots of great new music out there.
Frankly it just sounds like a variation of the modern life is rubbish mantra touted by some segments of the older generation.
Ruddy Damon Albarn, eh?
He is 55 so not sure I see your point.
The âStonedeadâ Festival seems to have been a great success⌠despite the rain this weekendâŚ
Is their music considered modernâŚ
Thanks for the link Porridge. I really enjoyed Rick Beatoâs interview of Thomas Newman. Like Rick I am a massive fan of Newmanâs film music.
I just read that as the Stoned dad festival
Daughter and her pals go every year⌠since forever it seemsâŚ
Hah, I was never a fan so that went right past me.
Hah, I was never a fan so that went right past me.
As has that Streak, A4 Pacific. Being at school not a million miles from Grantham I saw every one of those over the years.
Sorry, modern music is not my thing. Apart from the Beatles, the Stones, Abba and one or two others my interest spans the years from the 20s to 1959.
Apart from the Beatles, the Stones, Abba and one or two others my interest spans the years from the 20s to 1959.
I used to love listening to Malcolm Laycockâs programme on R2, which featured dance band music from that era.
I listen to all sorts of stuff, some quite esoteric, some absolute bubblegum for the ears.