You jest of course.
No? Waiting on a line for people asking questions that would take them a few minutes of research isnât what I consider efficient use of anyoneâs time.
I donât any of the few people that seem to keep survivefrance alive.
I struggle to see why this should be an issue. I keep some cash in my wallet for emergencies but, for everything else, itâs contactless. Quick, pain free and no need to handle coins and notes that have been through who knows how many filthy hands.
Interesting, thatâs not how I see it. At any given time during the day there are typically between 40 to 50 people reading this forum. Any post will typically receive at least one reply within minutes. The gite forum I used to belong to (and loved) was killed off by Facebook. Typically only 1 or 2 would be online and one could wait days (or never!) for a reply.
Survive France isnât just alive itâs thriving.
Bloody Apple fan boys, you are all the same ![]()
The first smart phone was the IBM personal communicator.
My first PDA smart phone was not apple, I was having dinner with a friend who worked for previously Sir Clive Sinclair, showed him my phone, he showed me his design for a smart phone he designed 5 years earlier. Unfortunately Sir Clive went down the early EV route so did not take up his design (silly man!) .
Sadly I am opposite to you and this is because.
No matter what age we are, the world will continue to evolve and it wonât stop and let you get off the bus just because. I agree that living the rural life on France saw we do itâs probably about the nearest we can get so long as we navigate the French beurocratic minefield very carefully and donât rock the boat.
So that said, none of us can just, stand still, and let life pass us by. Only if your one voice has a billion followers might you just about be heard above the din of Donal Trump and co.
So good luck top you.
Now go and have a lay down Brian it sounds like you need one.
When I fairs joined Survive France in 2013, the number of threads and posts where a lot more than they are now. Clearly the stalwarts continue. But here we are once again getting away from what this thread was about. Which I why I stopped using it years ago and only came back because of a facebook link. Bonne Courage.
While the Apple iPhone X (2017) is famously known for introducing secure 3D facial recognition (Face ID) to the mainstream, it was not the first smartphone to use facial recognition technology.
Here are the key details regarding the âfirstâ facial recognition phones:
-
Earliest Technology (2005): The âOKAO Vision Face Recognition Sensorâ by OMRON Corporation was announced as the worldâs first, designed for use in mobile devices as early as 2005.
-
Early Android Implementation (2011/2012): Android 4.0 âIce Cream Sandwichâ introduced âFace Unlockâ as a native feature, which appeared on devices like the Samsung
Apple also didnât invent the iPod either they pinched the idea and design from my friend Kane Kramer.
Wasnât apple the first smart phone without a keypad?
I suspect that most consumer technology can be described as âa solution looking for a problemâ. It âsolvesâ the problem in a way that brings most profit to the company selling the âsolutionâ, rather than starting with the problem and working out how it might be solved.
Those of us who are comfortable with tech, and especially those of us who have not known a world without mobile phones and computers (not many on SF), struggle to understand why someone might just prefer not to want to use it.
Most of the tech we have is far more capable and complex (and therefore expensive) than we need.
But it was just you that lead us away from the thread, so to get back to it, I appreciate that you are concerned at my refusal to double up on electronic equipment that I donât find any other use for and which, though not exactly expensive, is nevertheless some 8 times more expensive than my chosen path for continued existence.
I have found my preferred defence, and it has to be said that I did give it a fair go rather than dismissing it out of hand, so can you not find, during your brief reunion here, something to be happy about in that? ![]()
I have found that friends with Apple phones always seem to have problems. Crapple I call it. Also you will find small businesses will prefer cash for the proverbial cup of coffee due to the costs charged using cards or other devices.
It typically costs more to handle cash than it does to take a card payment, certainly in the UK and EU.
The biggest supporters of cash are typically tax dodgers and conspiracy theorists.
Our many local events prefer cash to cards but accounting is strict and thereâs no conspiracy. ![]()
and no-one has fallen ill from handling the stuff (not so far anywayâŚ)
EDIT: Our mobile-butcher takes cards but they donât always work due to poor signal⌠so itâs cash or chequesâŚ
Thatâs simply not true.
Also there was the Nokia 7710. Note that it had rounded corners ![]()
Donât mention CryptoâŚâŚ.but big institutions handle CryptoâŚâŚ.no target the little peopleâs purses and set their minds to believe it will all be better when itâs all digital.
No. See my answer above. It also wasnât the first with rounded corners, which Apple sued Samsung for in a long running legal saga.