I am hoping he doesn’t even win his seat! He just can’t help lying.
6 Likes
Unfortunately it’s a minimum of a ten year process. Acrimony from this will spill over into our lives in France with Boris at the helm.
1 Like
Personally I’ll be better off with the Tories in government but the country won’t, what should I hope for?
Unicorns? Is at that is what is about to be promised!
Perhaps you shouldn’t assume that, perhaps we will make UK citizens have an income of at least 40,000€ per head per annum to stay here, the point is you don’t know. And the real hoo-ha hasn’t even started.
And Brexit wasn’t voted for by a majority of the people, it was the majority, just, of those who bothered to vote. (And what a complete and utter shambles).
1 Like
I admit that I was caught up in all the complexities of moving to Brittany when the U.K. but not all of the uk and certainly not Scotland apparently voted to “leave”…,
I hope Bojo a petulant sulking liar with no mandate and no majoriry loses his seat…I’m no fortune teller but it would seem to me that “the will of the people”to “leave” is fake news and an urban myth…
We’ll see…
Democracy at its best 
I totally agree, B-liar introduced PFI which was forced through to save government spending and was never “the cheaper option” and his wife made a fortune suing the government. He took us into a war under false pretences and retired a millionaire . Socialist? I don’t think so.
Actually it was a Tory idea, although Blair did make extensive use of them.
Wasn’t it Tony Blair’s government that went all out on the Human Rights Act, when his wife worked for a law chambers that specialised in human rights or was that just a right wing press invention?
The alternative would have been a bit odd though - to not push through Human Rights legislation, simply because the PM’s wife might be accused of a conflict of interest.
I agree but I saw the slant some papers put on it at the time
My mistake! I do not remember the Labour opposition planning about unfair comparison of costs but I do remember some horrific examples of cost massaging by the Labour government some of which you highlight.
To be fair PFI has rather become associated with the Blair years because most of the projects date from that time.
Also, quite a few projects were brought to realisation which might well not have been otherwise - so it’s hard to say that there was no benefit to the programme…
But the ongoing costs from some of these PFI projects has become a significant millstone around the necks of local authorities, the NHS and ultimately the tax-payer.
I would have thought some legislation to limit costs would be a vote winner, haven’t seen any appetite for it though.
But that would be the Government going back on its word, we could not trust anything that they said after that, 
♂
The average voter does not understand that there is a difference between capital costs and the rest of the budget.
All they hear is the total amount and they have no idea how it is apportioned.
1 Like
Comme d’habitude.
We are being advised to vote Labour!