I haven’t yet checked up on this, but Novara Media generally are accurate in my experience.
I agree but think that might be a difficult choice regarding ‘where to?’
But what I do think should happen is that there should be a virtual, if not actual, international route between airport and building, I have long thought it was outrageous that the US could decide who goes there.
Like some sort of Vatican? A small state within a state?
If it works like that there, yes, hadn’t thought of that though.
Andorra? San Marino? Pimlico? 
To be more serious though, what happens with embassies, can the state in which they are placed prevent anyone visiting them?
That’d go down well in Geneva, and the rest of the EU.
Some fat cat politically motivated lawyers, sitting behind their leather covered desks in the UK, attacking brave, dedicated and compassionate Médecins Sans Frontières doctors, who are respected and admired all over the World.
I hope it’s true. It’d just reveal the true nature and intent of UKFLI.
“UK lobby group cannot be a charitable trust because a charity cannot exist for a political purpose.”
They should have their charitable trust status challenged, they are a lobby group not a charity.
yes it would have Embassy status in that case. But so far ss I know no embassy has a protected access route.
Broken News have a take on the Ed Sheeran tour. https://youtu.be/mVRew0aqZTw?si=awOXAXcijT76fwqw
A nice bit of balance in there too.
That about sums it up.
Good to see France standing up.
Meanwhile the Israeli press picks up on a mistake in Macron’s speech.
Netanyahu decries Macron’s ‘grotesque’ claim that Hamas ‘never operated’ in West Bank | The Times of Israel https://share.google/VuaaSBbfgya05bVsU
Of course Macron made an error. That does not mean that Israel under Natanyahu is correct in it’s current actions.
Yet another source confirming Netanyahu was warned in advance about the 7th October attack.
It was the Haaretz newspaper that broke the story of the warning. After his UN speech Netanyahu had had a secret trip to the UAE to try and c over it up.
“Netanyahu asked Sheikh Mohamed to deny the report, according to a person said to have firsthand information about the meeting”
Unfortunately for him Egypt also warned him, twice.
Looks like a blind eye was turned so Oct. 7th could be used as provocation for the Gaza Genocide and upping the rate and speed of the West Bank ethnic cleansing.
And Israel is heading towards becoming an exclusively Jewish state.
Court directed by Ben-Givr.
Well, that’s what Zionism has always been about, isn’t it? An exclusively Jewish state. Many would consider that a racist philosophy, as the UK Green Party is now debating.
Yes but do they refuse you residence and naturalisation if you say you are not Jewish?
Unlike France, the UK is officially a Christian state is it not, but that doesn’t prevent those of different faiths or not from becoming British.
Edit: Of course there are Israeli Arabs who are presumably Moslem, are they accorded full rights of citizenship as the Jews are?
Interesting subject which hasn’t occurred to me before.
The Israeli Declaration of Independence states that all citizens are to be equal irrespective of race religion etc. Many or most Arabs who were still inside Israel at that time were granted citizenship.
The actual daily life of Arabs in Israel is apparently very different than that. Regards land ownership and work, and political parties, they are not treated equally.
Think of 1920’s Alabama.
The occupied territories: Gaza, West Bank, & Golan heights, are illegal (UN says) occupations. Israeli “settlers” are taking illegally land owned by Arabs, and are apparently being helped by the heavily biased IDF.
Try looking at what the UN’s special reporter Francesca Albanese has to say about it all.
No they have different id cards and aren’t treated the same, they aren’t treated as badly as people from the West Bank let alone Gaza though.